An aMap (argument map) is a visual representation of the structure of an argument in informal logic. It includes the components of an argument such as a main contention, premises, co-premises, objections, rebuttals and lemmas. Argument maps are often used in the teaching of reasoning and critical thinking and can support the analysis of pros and cons when deliberating over problems. This approach in argument mapping seeks to enable research and analysis of natural human decision making in real life contexts of risk and uncertainty. The techniques involved were first presented by Facione and Facione in ‘Thinking and Reasoning in Human Decision Making: The Method of Argument and Heuristic Analysis’.
Tags Argument Map Argument Mapping Co-Premises Contention Heuristic Analysis Human Human Decision Making Informal Logic Method of Argument Objections Premises Real Life Rebuttals Risk and Uncertainty Thinking and Reasoning Visual Representation
Environment Day Quotes in English: World environment day is also known as the Environment Day, Eco Day …